Peer Review Process

* Each article is evaluated by at least two expert referees in the relevant subject area.
* The referees are required to judge the article within the specified period of time and based on the policies and guidelines of the publication.
* The refereeing of the articles in the bi-monthly book on the interpretation of the Holy Qur'an is based on two-way anonymous refereeing (the identity of the author of the article and the referee are not known to both parties).

Steps to evaluate articles

  1. The only way to receive the article is through the system of bi-monthly journals.
  2.  The initial evaluation of the article is done according to the main indicators of the bi-quarterly journal, which includes: topic, approach, structure of the article, etc.
  3. Review of the article in terms of plagiarism and matching will be done through the matching system of Samim Noor
  4. Sending the article to at least 2 expert referees in the subject area of ​​the article.
  5.  Announcing the result of the arbitration to the author through the system.
  6.  Pursuing revision of articles by authors.
  7.  Sending the revised article to the referee (acceptance/rejection)
  8.  Announcement of the referee result to the author (acceptance/rejection)
  9. Sending the letter of acceptance to the author
  10. Placing the article in the articles section accepted for publication
  11. Determining the issue in which the article will be published (with the opinion of the editor)
  12. Send the article to the editor
  13. Sending the edited article to the author for clarification and final approval before publication
  14. Sending the final file approved by the author to the layout page
  15. Publication of articles in the journal system
  16. Sending articles to national and international databases and profiles