*Jary* (application of the text to new instances) and *Tatbiq* (matching/mapping) are key concepts for understanding the supra-historical nature of the Quran; however, in exegetical works, they often overlap with terms such as *Batn* (inner meaning), *Ta’wil* (esoteric interpretation), and the principle of *al-‘ibrah bi-‘umum al-lafz* (relying on the generality of the wording), leading to ambiguity regarding their epistemological status. This study aims to identify the types of conceptual overlaps, trace their origins, and propose a solution. Data collection was conducted via library research, and analysis was based on an examination of Quranic commentaries and the traditions of the Infallibles (AS). The findings indicate that this overlap stems from two factors: first, a specific interpretation of the traditions of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS)—suggesting that they intended to establish an independent discipline of *Jary* and *Tatbiq*—whereas their primary objective was to impart knowledge that reveals the supra-historical nature and continuity of Divine intent. Second, the attempt to place this field on the same level as *Tafsir* (exegesis). The study concludes that the way forward lies in recognizing the true status of *Jary* and *Tatbiq* based on the traditions of the Infallibles (AS)—specifically, by acknowledging them as part of the process of understanding the Quran that reveals the continuity of Divine intent.